日月光(ASE)某位工程師,離別感言
日月光(ASE)某位工程師,離別感言, 這篇文章,造成公司不小的震撼, 還被副總約談一番, 經(jīng)過(guò)幾番慰留,目前暫以留職停薪處理,完成學(xué)業(yè)再說(shuō)!原文是英文,已附上翻譯.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I will end my job in ASE on 8/31 and then I will go to study?inNational Sun-Yan-San University.I want to appreciate many peoplein ASE during my working time.am glad to cooperate with you over two years.
我將在8/31結(jié)束我在日月光的工作,然後我將到中山大學(xué)讀書(shū)。我要感謝很多在我於日月光工作期間幫助我的人。非常高興能與你們合作超過(guò)兩年的時(shí)光。
I entered ASE on 2000/3/13. It's nearly my first job (my firstjob existed only one month) after I graduated from army, and I
learned> many things during two years. There are many advantages inthis company.
我在2000/3/13進(jìn)到日月光,這幾乎是我自陸軍退伍後的第一份工作(我的第一份工作僅做了一個(gè)月),在這兩年當(dāng)中,我學(xué)到很多事情。
First, the hierarchy in ASE is not very obvious. The distinctnessamong manager, staff member and clerk is latent and working atmospherein ASE is approximatelyharmonious.That's the reason why I can stayhere over two years.
第一,日月光的階級(jí)意識(shí)不是非常明顯,經(jīng)理、職員和助理之間的差異是潛在的’b日月光的工作氣氛大致上是很和諧的,這也是我為什麼能在此超過(guò)兩年的原因。
Second, semiconductor industry is a global competitive environment.Working in ASE can help me to extend my vision about world environment.Working in ASE can help me to extend my vision about world because I have many opportunities to work with people from many countries.
English ability improvement is the largest income for me in my careerlife. This experience can help me to compete with other people in this globalize competitive market in the future. Working in IC assembly
industry can study about knowledge of all the semiconductor supply chain from wafer fabrication to SMT.
It's a good way to involve into electronic engineering for
mechanical background engineers.
第二,半導(dǎo)體產(chǎn)業(yè)是全球競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性的環(huán)境,在日月光工作可以幫助擴(kuò)展自己對(duì)
世界的視野,因?yàn)榭梢杂袡C(jī)會(huì)跟來(lái)自不同國(guó)家的人工作。英文能力的提應(yīng)該是我
在日月光工作的最大收。這工作的經(jīng)驗(yàn)可以幫助我在未來(lái)全球化的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)市場(chǎng)上與他
人競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。
在封裝產(chǎn)業(yè)工作可以學(xué)習(xí)到整個(gè)半導(dǎo)體供應(yīng)鏈的知識(shí),從晶圓造到上板,
對(duì)於機(jī)械工程背景的工程師而言,這是切入電子工程的一個(gè)捷徑。
Third, I studied mechanical engineering in university and in
graduated school; working experience let me know about that other subject is
also important for an engineer. I didn't like chemistry in school, but
we have many chemical materials here and engineers need to have
knowledge about materials.This let me understand what's application of
knowledge in school and I also try to learn many things about semiconductor
by myself after work. These are my incomes in ASE during these two years.
第三,我在大學(xué)和研究所學(xué)的是機(jī)械工程,工作上的經(jīng)驗(yàn)使我了解其它的科
目對(duì)一位工程師是同樣重要的。我在學(xué)校不喜歡化學(xué),但是我們?cè)谶@用到很多化學(xué)
的材料,工程師需要有材料的相關(guān)知識(shí),這使我了解學(xué)校學(xué)的知識(shí)有何應(yīng)用,同時(shí)我
在上班時(shí)候還自修很多半導(dǎo)體的相關(guān)知識(shí)。這些都是我在日月光兩年的收。
Working in a large company can also let me know about what other
department doing in an enterprise like human resource, producing
management,inventory, and many things. ASE is an institutional company.
Maybe someone doesn't think so.?But if we compare with some other
companies, ASE is really more institutional in many departments.
在大公司工作也可讓我知道在一間企業(yè)其它部門(mén)的功能,像是人資、生產(chǎn)管
理、倉(cāng)儲(chǔ)管理和很多的事情,日月光是間有制度的公司,也許有人不認(rèn)為如此,
如果跟某些其它公司來(lái)說(shuō),日月光的確在很多部門(mén)還是比較有制度的。
However, I also have some suggestions and complaints about ASE.?
The definition of position of process engineer is not very clear.
After worked here over two years, I am still not sure what's the
difference among process engineer, R&D engineer and QA engineer.?
People in production line also don't know about this point.?So there are
many tedious things need process engineer to do.
然而,我也有一些對(duì)日月光的建議和抱怨。程工程師職務(wù)的定義不是很明確,
在工作兩年之後,我還是不太確定,到底程、研發(fā)和品管工程師的差異在哪里。
生產(chǎn)線的人同樣也不清楚這一點(diǎn),所以有很多繁雜之事都要程工程師去處理。
Most things I handled in my first year in ASE are excursive events
happened in production line. I always answer phone from production
line,"There is a wetting not enough case, and what should we do" What
can I do?? The solution is to reject or to waive.?Isn't it the job of
QA engineer?
Why don't people in production call QA engineer to argue the waived
criteria with QA engineer? Why I must waive the products for production
line? Why don't people in production line be responsible for their fault?
Most of my time in first year is to sign "Hold and Release notice" day
after day.Isn't it the job of supervisor in production line?
在我在日月光的第一年,大部份時(shí)間都是處理生產(chǎn)線發(fā)生的異常。我常接到從生產(chǎn)
線打來(lái)的電話說(shuō):「有一批貨有出水不良,我們要怎麼辦?」我能怎麼辦?不是退貨
就是放寬規(guī)格。這不是QA工程師該做的嗎?為什麼生產(chǎn)線不自己去找QA工程師談放寬
的規(guī)格?為什麼我必須替生產(chǎn)線放寬產(chǎn)品規(guī)格?為什麼生產(chǎn)線的人不能替自己造成的
問(wèn)題負(fù)責(zé)?在我第一年的大部份時(shí)間就是日復(fù)一日地簽停止放行單,這不是生產(chǎn)線主
任就可以做的工作嗎?
I supposed job of process engineer is similar with R&D
engineer,but besides new process and material phased in, we also have to handle
all the tedious and trouble things happened in production line. They
are like they can't find travel cards, lead-frames are not enough, they
set up by wrong parameters, and they don't know where the products shipped.
Most of our energy is be exhausted by these boring and routine things
happened in production line. I don't think that process engineer still have
interesting to learn about new invention in assembly technology after
twisted by these tedious things. Therefore when we really meat large trouble
from customer complaint, we don't know how to solve it.
It's like n-VIDIA case, and we lost a large customer. Engineers
are exhausted by so many little tedious things and then they don't
have enough ability to solve real excursion needs engineers to handle.
We can even say it's lack of professional ability. In my opinion, an
engineer should be trained to have ability to solve big trouble, not the chicke
n feathers and garlic skins. On the other hand, an engineer's ability
should be based on knowledge of materials, process, and equipment but
doesn't on tedious administration procedure.
我假設(shè)程工程師的工作是類似研發(fā)工程師,但是除了新程和新材料的導(dǎo)
入之外,我們還必須處理所有生產(chǎn)線發(fā)生的雜務(wù)和麻煩。像是一些他們找不到路
單、釘架不夠用、他們?cè)O(shè)錯(cuò)數(shù)、他們不知道產(chǎn)品該出貨到哪里。我們工程師大部份
的精力就耗在這些發(fā)生在生產(chǎn)線上無(wú)聊又重覆的事情。
在被這些雜事糾纏之後,我不認(rèn)為程工程師還會(huì)有興趣去學(xué)習(xí)封裝技術(shù)的相關(guān)新知。
因此,當(dāng)我們真正遇到來(lái)自客戶抱怨的重大異常時(shí),我們反而不知該如何解決,
如同n-Vidia的個(gè)案,我們因此失去了一個(gè)大客戶。工程師被太多細(xì)小瑣事纏身,然
後他們沒(méi)有能力解決真正需要工程師處理的異常,我們甚至可以說(shuō)是專業(yè)能力不足?
我認(rèn)為,一位工程師應(yīng)該被訓(xùn)練有能力處理大麻煩,而不是一些雞毛蒜皮的小事。
換句話說(shuō),工程師的能力應(yīng)該以對(duì)材料、程、設(shè)備的知識(shí)為基礎(chǔ),而不是在
處理繁雜行政程序上。
Peter Drucker proposed that enterprise must reduce tedious things
for knowledge worker whose contribution is not handling these routine
things.
Does ASE consider engineer be a knowledge worker? When we phased in a
new material, most we can do is to try and error. We try to use
different materials and processes and to compare them by reliability result.
We always do experiment blindly from customer's request. Many
engineer don't have enough knowledge background to convince customer it's
unnecessary to do it because engineers don't have enough time to study.?These
boring excursive events only exhaust them and engineers don't grow up intheir
knowledge.When they notice about this, the only thing they can do is to change
a new way in their career life.
If we really hope that engineers can extend their knowledge
during working,we should train people in production line to handle something
independently.At least, I don't consider to sign "hold and release notice" or t
o change the defect code to die discrepancy code or to account how many
dies lost during process or to bind working instructions on travel cards
can help engineers to extend their knowledge.?
I think that company provides 30000 one month to an engineer also
doesn't want he only to handle this kind of things.
彼得杜拉克認(rèn)為企業(yè)應(yīng)該減少知識(shí)工作者的雜務(wù),因?yàn)樗麄儗?duì)公司的貢獻(xiàn)不在於處
理這些瑣事。日月光是否視工程師為知識(shí)工作者呢?當(dāng)我們導(dǎo)入新材料時(shí),我們最常
做的就嘗試錯(cuò)誤。我們?cè)囍貌煌牟牧虾统瘫容^它們可靠度的結(jié)果。我們總是盲
目地做著客戶要求的實(shí)驗(yàn),很多工程師并沒(méi)有足夠的知識(shí)背景說(shuō)服客戶這是不需要做
的,因?yàn)樗麄儾](méi)有足夠的時(shí)間去學(xué)習(xí)。工程師不斷地虛耗在一些瑣事上面,又無(wú)
法在知識(shí)上有成長(zhǎng)。
當(dāng)他們發(fā)現(xiàn)到這一點(diǎn)時(shí),他們唯一能做的就是另外在他們職業(yè)生涯中找新的出路。
如果我們真的希望工程師們能在工作中拓展知識(shí),我們應(yīng)該訓(xùn)練生產(chǎn)線的人獨(dú)立處理某些事
。
至少,我不認(rèn)為 簽"暫停放行單"或是將缺點(diǎn)碼調(diào)成晶粒差異或是h數(shù)
程中損失多少顆晶粒還是將作業(yè)指示釘在路單上可以幫助工程師擴(kuò)展他們的知識(shí)。
我想,公司每個(gè)月花三萬(wàn)元請(qǐng)一位工程師也不希望他只是處理這一類的事情。
What's the definition of character for process engineer? It's confined
in manufacture engineer or R&D engineer? If we define PE in manufacture
engineer, we should reduce developing loading and if we define PE in R&D
engineer,we should reduce tedious things handling from production line.
No matter what kind of identification, I think an engineer must focused
his career on improve professional knowledge and ability, not on
signing notice, changing defect codes, binding travel cards, falsifying data,
or picking up the pieces. However engineers in ASE waste their 80% time
on these tedious things.
到底程工程師的職務(wù)上的定義為何?應(yīng)該定位為研發(fā)或是造?如果將PE定位為
造,我們就應(yīng)該減少研發(fā)的負(fù)擔(dān);如果將PE定位為研發(fā),我們就應(yīng)該減少生產(chǎn)線發(fā)
生的瑣事處理。不管是定義在哪一方面,我認(rèn)為,一位工程師應(yīng)該將他職務(wù)焦點(diǎn)放在
提升專業(yè)知識(shí)與能力,而不是簽通知單,調(diào)帳,釘路單,造假資料或是收拾殘局上面。
然而,日月光的工程師卻花費(fèi)他們80%的時(shí)間在這類的雜務(wù)上面。
Although most of time for a process engineer is to handle excursion
in production line, quarterly merit score is according the quantity
of reports you provided.?It's very well to assess staff by quality scores,
but items are not matched with percentage of working loading. I don't
know what's the purpose the managers want engineers to do. If I give up
handling excursion and let production line to do by themselves and I just work
hard to write many reports in the office,
I can still get high scores in every quarterly merit.
Why do I need to be twisted by tedious things?
Is writing reports really the main job of process engineer?
Apparently, managers want us to focus on OJT,project and task.?
But if we really respect engineer's knowledge growing up and on job training,
I consider that we must reducing tedious things loading to engineer
andgive us more time to study.
Learning is also one segment of our job in studying organization.
Learning new knowledge shouldn't be the another loading for us.
管一位程工程師大部份的時(shí)間都是處理生產(chǎn)線上發(fā)生的異常,然而,季考核的
分 數(shù)卻是根據(jù)你產(chǎn)出報(bào)告的數(shù)量為依據(jù)??己丝梢宰隽炕脑u(píng)核是非常好的事,
然而項(xiàng)目卻和工作負(fù)擔(dān)比例不相符。我不知道經(jīng)理們希望工程師如此做的目的為何。
如果我放棄處理生產(chǎn)線發(fā)生的異常,請(qǐng)他們自行解決,而我只是待在辦公室寫(xiě)很多報(bào)告,
我依然可以在每季的考核中拿到高分,為何我還需要被這些瑣事糾纏?寫(xiě)報(bào)告真的就
是工程師的主要工作嗎?顯然地,經(jīng)理們是希望我們將焦點(diǎn)放在在職訓(xùn)練、專案處理
上面。可是,如果我們真的重視工程師知識(shí)的成長(zhǎng)和在職訓(xùn)練,我認(rèn)為我們必須減少
瑣事對(duì)工程師的負(fù)擔(dān)。學(xué)習(xí)就是學(xué)習(xí)型組織工作的一部份,學(xué)習(xí)新知不應(yīng)是我們額外的負(fù)擔(dān)
。
Do anyone try to search the solution from our KM server? Do you know
the cause of delamination? Do you know the cause of solder voids after
SMT? When I met these case, I try to find solution through our KM server,
but I am disappointed. I can't find information of delmination and solder
voids. So I try to search by Internet. When I key in delmination,
reliability,PDF in GOOGLE, I can get hundreds papers talked about?reliability.
I knew that delamination caused by thermal stress and moisture through
different failure phenomenon. When I got complaint about solder voids
from customer,I also try to search solder voids, SMT, PDF through GOOGLE,
and also? get hundreds papers talked solder voids caused by IR
reflow problems.?
We even don't know that many problems had been sloved by other
people. Some companies showed their research result publicly. I felt
that I should have confidence to tell customer it's SMT problem and then
I got help from PC-Liu talked to me it's caused by via hole on the PCB through
IR reflow.
After we took samples to QA to do FA, the SEM shown it really caused
by SMT problem not the package problem. I solved this problem through
knowledge and expert's help, not through handling tedious things from MFG.
Handling rountine can only add our experience, but can't add our knowledge!
However there are many troubles need to be solved by engineer's
knowledge!
有人試著透過(guò)KM的主機(jī)尋找解答嗎??你知道造成delamination的原因嗎?你知道經(jīng)過(guò)
表面黏著後造成錫孔洞的原因嗎?當(dāng)我遇到這問(wèn)題時(shí),我試著透過(guò)我們的KM主機(jī)尋找
解答,可是我感到失望,我無(wú)法發(fā)現(xiàn)delamination和錫孔洞的資訊.
所以,我透過(guò)網(wǎng)際網(wǎng)路去搜尋當(dāng)我在GOOGLE打入delamination, relaibility, PDF時(shí),
我可以得到數(shù)百篇有關(guān)可靠度的文獻(xiàn).?我知道了delamination是由氣和熱應(yīng)力造成的, 由
不同的失敗模式可看出結(jié)果當(dāng)我接到客戶有關(guān)於錫孔洞的抱怨,我也試著透過(guò)GOOGLE
搜尋solder voids, SMT, PDF并且得到百篇的文獻(xiàn)討論由造成的錫孔洞.
一些公司很大方地公開(kāi)他們的研究成果.我覺(jué)得我應(yīng)該有信心告訴客戶,這是SMT的問(wèn)題.
然後我得到劉百洲的幫忙告訴我是印刷電路板上導(dǎo)孔經(jīng)過(guò)時(shí)造成的,
在我們送樣品到QA做失敗分析後, SEM顯示的確是SMT的問(wèn)題而不是封裝的問(wèn)題.
我解決這問(wèn)題透過(guò)的是知識(shí)和專家的協(xié)助,而不是透過(guò)處理生產(chǎn)線的瑣事,處理例行
事務(wù)只能增加我們的經(jīng)驗(yàn), 可是無(wú)法增長(zhǎng)我們的知識(shí) 然而,很多的問(wèn)題卻是需要透過(guò)工程師
的知識(shí)來(lái)解決
We found corrosion after wafer sawn for one customer. Customer give
us many wafers to saw. Our D/A engineer just take wafers to MFG to saw
again and again. If you read text book of wafer fabrication, textbook tell
you corrosion caused by chemical residue after etching.
Wasting one days to saw wafer is worse to wasting two hours to read textbook.
In my opinion, if we can't tell customer this, sawing wafers
experiments again and again only waste our time and money and can't get any
effective improvement. We stand behind machine all day long to watch the
machine sawing wafers.Engineers feel very tired certainly. Why don't we
show the information on textbook to customer and tell them it caused by wafer
fabrication
If wafer fab doesn't want to improve, assembly house can't get
effective improvement.
我們發(fā)現(xiàn)有一家客戶的晶圓在切割後有腐蝕,客戶給我們很多晶圓去切割,我們的D/A
工程師就一次又一次帶著晶圓去生產(chǎn)線切.如果你讀過(guò)晶圓程的教科書(shū),教科書(shū)會(huì)告
訴你,腐蝕是由蝕刻過(guò)後的化學(xué)殘留造成的.
花一天的時(shí)間去切晶圓還不如花兩小時(shí)去查教科書(shū)
我們卻常整天在機(jī)臺(tái)旁罰站,看著機(jī)臺(tái)切著晶圓,工程師當(dāng)然覺(jué)得很辛苦以我的觀點(diǎn)
看來(lái),如果不告訴客戶這一點(diǎn),一次又一次的切割實(shí)驗(yàn)只不過(guò)是浪費(fèi)我們的時(shí)間跟金錢(qián)
又得不到有效的結(jié)果而已. 為何我們不拿出教科書(shū)的資訊告訴客戶,這是晶圓造的
問(wèn)題??如果晶圓廠不改善,封裝廠也無(wú)法提供有效的改善.
Another complaint is the thing everyone has ever known, salary and
welfare. Have you ever watched discussions in BBS of Internet about ASE?
Most discussions are complaining about the low salary.Despite somebody
complains about low salary, ASE still has a loud reputation in society
for people who don't know inside information.
When my friends knew about I am working in ASE, they usually showed
admiration and asked:
"Oh ochyou must have over 500000 NT dollars one month."
I just laughed and didn't answer them.
另一件要抱怨的是每個(gè)人都已經(jīng)知道的,薪資福利。有人曾看過(guò)網(wǎng)路BBS關(guān)於日月光
的討論,大多數(shù)的討論都在抱怨低薪資。管有些抱怨低薪資,日月光對(duì)於社會(huì)上
不知道內(nèi)情的人而言,仍享有響亮的名聲。
當(dāng)我的朋友知道我在日月光工作時(shí),他們常露出羨慕的表情問(wèn)道:
日月光喔..你應(yīng)該一個(gè)月有超過(guò)五萬(wàn)元吧?」我只是笑而不答。
This joke demonstrates that salary in ASE is lower than the average
level people noticed in industry. I think it's not a glory for the second
largest assembly house in the world. At least, we should be equal with
ASECL,right?
People in ASECL have worked five days a week for a long time. Why do
people in south Taiwan need to tolerate getting lower salary and welfare?
If the salary can't attract an engineer and he can't grow up from
working.What's the decision he will make? Of course, engineers also handle
routine in some other companies, but they get a lot of stocks or money to
keep they staying.
這笑話顯示日月光的薪資低於業(yè)界人們知道的平均水準(zhǔn)。我想對(duì)世界第二大封裝廠而言,
不是一件光彩之事。 至少,我們應(yīng)該跟中壢廠的水準(zhǔn)一樣吧?中壢廠的員工早就實(shí)施
休二日有一段期間了,為什麼住臺(tái)灣南部的人就必須忍受較低的薪資福利呢?
如果薪資對(duì)一位工程師沒(méi)有吸引力,他又無(wú)法在工作中成長(zhǎng),他會(huì)做什麼決定呢?
當(dāng)然,在某些公司的工程師也是處理一些例行瑣事,可是他們得到很多股票和金錢(qián)使得
他們?cè)敢饬粝聛?lái)。
We all heard that managers announced that top manager has noticed
about this and tried to improve this salary structure. I had heard about
this information when I entered ASE, and we heard this kind of
announcement every year, so I hoped it's really true good news to everyone.
我們都聽(tīng)過(guò)經(jīng)理們宣告上層主管已體認(rèn)到這問(wèn)題,并試著改善這樣的薪資結(jié)
構(gòu),當(dāng)我剛進(jìn)日月光時(shí)就聽(tīng)過(guò)了,而且我們每一年都聽(tīng)過(guò)這樣的聲明,所以我希望
這次對(duì)位的確是真的好消息。
We also know about that top manager wants to promote everyone's
job title from project engineer to product manager. Girls in club also
called public manager, so all of them are managers. In fact, realistic
income of the job is more practical than the title of the job.
Salary of assistants in some companies is better than of engineers in ASE.
Incomes of assistants in university is over 30000 one month and incomes of
assist professor in university is over 60000 one month. However these jobs
title are named with assist.
我們也知道上層主管有意提工程師的職稱,將專案工程師的頭銜為產(chǎn)品經(jīng)理。
酒店里的小姐也被稱作是公關(guān)經(jīng)理,她們每個(gè)人都是經(jīng)理。事實(shí)上,職位上
實(shí)在的收入要比職稱更為實(shí)際,一些公司助理的薪水還比日月光的工程師來(lái)得高,大
學(xué)助教一個(gè)月有三萬(wàn)元以上;助理教授一個(gè)月有六萬(wàn)元以上。然而,這些職稱都有助
理之名。
The table shows the mean salary in industry, we can compare with them.
I hope that we can reach this average level at least.
下表顯示業(yè)界的平均薪資,我希望至少可達(dá)到平均的水準(zhǔn)吧?
各產(chǎn)業(yè)大學(xué)畢業(yè)新進(jìn)人員薪資|
名次 行業(yè) 薪資
1 金融業(yè) 34928
2電腦邊業(yè) 33460
3 半導(dǎo)體業(yè) 32990
4電子元件業(yè) 32960
5通訊電信業(yè) 32810
6 化工業(yè) 32780
7 光電業(yè) 32500
8 藥業(yè) 32250
9 出版業(yè) 31860
10家電電機(jī)業(yè) 31760
11 汽機(jī)車業(yè) 31710
12 紡織業(yè) 31650
13 鋼鐵業(yè) 31150
14 貿(mào)易業(yè) 31130
15電腦軟體業(yè) 31110
16 網(wǎng)路及網(wǎng)路服務(wù)業(yè)30970
17 保險(xiǎn)業(yè)30660
18 橡膠膠帶業(yè)30650
19 傳播業(yè)30500
20 汽機(jī)車銷售業(yè) 30350
21 建材廚具業(yè)30150
22 電腦及資訊服務(wù)業(yè)30070
23 金屬品業(yè)29960
24 營(yíng)建業(yè)29640
25 機(jī)械業(yè)29430
26 光學(xué)儀器業(yè)29200
27 超市量販業(yè)29090
28 券業(yè)29000
29 百貨業(yè)28950
30 電腦零組件業(yè)28800
31 休旅游業(yè)28840
32 食品業(yè)27570
|各產(chǎn)業(yè)碩士畢業(yè)新進(jìn)人員薪資|
名次 行業(yè) 薪資
1 電子元件業(yè) 40570
2 通訊電信業(yè) 39560
3 電腦軟體業(yè) 39160
4 半導(dǎo)體業(yè) 38740
5 貿(mào)易業(yè) 37917
6 金融業(yè) 37915
7 電腦邊業(yè) 37760
8 光電業(yè) 37570
9 汽機(jī)車業(yè) 37320
10 化工業(yè) 37140
11 紡織業(yè) 37130
12 家電電機(jī)業(yè) 36130
13 鋼鐵業(yè) 35870
14 網(wǎng)路及網(wǎng)路服務(wù)業(yè)35840
15 券業(yè) 35710
16 藥業(yè)35700
17橡膠膠帶業(yè)35420
18電腦及資訊服務(wù)業(yè)39380
19保險(xiǎn)業(yè)35288
20電腦零組件業(yè)34910
21汽機(jī)車銷售業(yè)34840
22百貨業(yè)34783
23光學(xué)儀器業(yè)34633
24機(jī)械業(yè)34590
25金屬品業(yè)34490
26超市量販業(yè)34067
27傳播業(yè)34038
28建材廚具業(yè)34000
29食品業(yè)33880
30營(yíng)建業(yè)33125
31出版業(yè)31800
32休旅游業(yè)31400
The purpose of OJT system in process engineering department is good.
But in version of knowledge management, OJT system is only a document
deposition system.
The design of search is only be sorted by author. If I want to
find an excursion case, I must know about who the author is. The
transition speed of server is too slow. When I open an education material,
I must wait for minutes and system usually down. The system is not friendly
and people still don't have habit to search solution by system. Top managers
only want engineers to produce many documents, but we don't control the
quality and don't build a convenience system for people to use. When we meet
problems,mostly we can't get some help from this server and most people
don't have habits to collect data to solve problems.
We always blind our head to do many experiments or to edit specious reason to convince customers but we don't know how to use knowledge to explain problems. The result is everyone felt tired but problems still exist because everyone use labor concentrated method to solve problems
程工程師在職訓(xùn)練的目的是好的,但是以知識(shí)管理的觀點(diǎn)來(lái)看,OJT只能算是一文件儲(chǔ)存系統(tǒng)。搜尋的設(shè)計(jì)是依照作者設(shè)定,如果我想要搜尋一件異常案例,我必須要知道作者是誰(shuí)。伺服器的傳輸速度太慢,當(dāng)我打開(kāi)一件訓(xùn)練教材時(shí),我必須等待好幾分鐘,系統(tǒng)常常當(dāng)機(jī)。系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)不夠友善,員工仍沒(méi)有從系統(tǒng)找尋解決方案的習(xí)慣。
高層主管只想到要工程師提供很多的文件,但是我們沒(méi)有管控品質(zhì),并且未建立一方便人們使用的系統(tǒng)。當(dāng)我們遇到問(wèn)題時(shí),我們也不太能從這系統(tǒng)找到什麼有幫助的知識(shí),大部份人也沒(méi)有習(xí)慣去收集資料來(lái)解決問(wèn)題, 我們總是著頭拼命做實(shí)驗(yàn),或是編一些似是而非的理由去說(shuō)服客戶,卻不知用現(xiàn)有的知識(shí)來(lái)解釋問(wèn)題.結(jié)果是大家都很累, 問(wèn)題還是存在,大家都用勞力密集的方法去解問(wèn)題
The labor distribution for process engineer is not fair. Die attached engineer have to handle from grinding to plasma cleaning, and sometimes he is also called by 3rd optical inspection or molding or visualinspection because there are die attached defects found by them. However some stage engineer only handle one process station. Average career life of mdie attached engineers in plant 7 is never over one year because it really too tired.?The labor distribution seems all the same in IC assembly industry,but does anybody review the labor distribution is fair or not? I?suggest that there should be one engineer to handle only die attached,and another engineer to handle grinding to 2nd optical inspection.Plasma cleaning should be belonged to wire bonding engineer.
程工程師的勞力分配不公平。黏晶工程師要從研磨管到電漿清洗,有時(shí)候還要被三光、封模、外觀的人召喚因?yàn)榘l(fā)現(xiàn)黏晶的缺點(diǎn)。然而,一些單站工程師卻只要負(fù)責(zé)一個(gè)站別。在七廠的黏晶工程師平均的工作年資從未超過(guò)一年,因?yàn)閷?shí)在是太操勞了。這樣的勞力分配似乎是整個(gè)封裝業(yè)都是一樣,可是從沒(méi)人檢討過(guò)這樣是否公平嗎?
我建議應(yīng)該一位工程師僅負(fù)責(zé)黏晶粒,一位工程師負(fù)責(zé)研磨到二光檢查,電漿清洗可歸由線工程師負(fù)責(zé)。
When I went to ASE, I was be belonged to BCC team. The capacity of BCC increased from 200k one week to 200k one month. The yield improvedfrom 99.5% to above 99.88%. I consider that we are good in PE department.
BCC team didn't received any offical customer complaint when it mass produced in first year. Our effect of OJT and project/task also head the list of successful candidates. However I think we don't get enough notice in PE department. Members of BCC is four men in the first and it's still four men after my leaving.
More capacity of products; more loading for engineers. It's to push egineers to find new jobs ..I have a feeling that BCC is like an orphan to be shifted from here to there beacuse BCC belongs to neither BGA packages nor traditional leadframepackages.
If there is any lack of members for other teams, they will pull people from our team. Maybe it beacuse we don't have big trouble to affect order from customers, so they feel that BCC may or may not be needed. This way is serious attack to member's morale in our team.
當(dāng)我剛進(jìn)到日月光時(shí), 被歸屬於BCC team, BCC從當(dāng)時(shí)的一200K的產(chǎn)量到一日200K以上良率由99.5%提到99.88%以上,我一直覺(jué)得本組在程工程處算是表現(xiàn)不錯(cuò)的,BCC 量產(chǎn)第一年沒(méi)有任何一件正式客戶抱怨, 在OJT及專案上的表現(xiàn)也都是名列前矛,?
然而, 我覺(jué)得我們?cè)赑E部門(mén)并沒(méi)有受到足夠的重視, BCC的工程師從一開(kāi)始的四人到最後我離開(kāi)後還是四人, 品越做越多, 工程師的負(fù)擔(dān)越來(lái)越重, 公司這麼做是在逼人找新頭路感覺(jué)上, BCC不屬於BGA產(chǎn)品, 又不屬於傳統(tǒng) 釘架產(chǎn)品, 像是爹不疼娘不愛(ài)地被人踢來(lái)踢去, 各組一有缺人馬上就從本組拉人, 許我們沒(méi)有發(fā)生過(guò)嚴(yán)重到影響客戶訂單的大問(wèn)題, 所以有點(diǎn)可有可無(wú)的感覺(jué)吧這種作法對(duì)於本組的士氣是一種嚴(yán)重的打擊
It seems like I have more complaints than acknowledgement. I think that since I will end my job, I should tell all the things I want to say to everyone. Maybe it's also the thing you want to say but you don't brave to.I hope that I really response everyone's heartfelt wishes. In my researching career of doctiral students,I hope that I can research knowledge sharing and collection in Internet and how to use information technology and knowledge management to help engineers to reduce their
tedious things to make enterprise staff grow up but exhaust their ability.
At last I still want to appreciate everyone, I hope that everyone can get good salary and grow up in ASE in the future. Maybe we have opportunity to cooperate after I get degree few years lalter.
看來(lái)似乎我的抱怨要比感謝詞多,我想既然我將結(jié)束工作,我應(yīng)該將我想對(duì)大家說(shuō)的話說(shuō)出來(lái),也許這也是你想說(shuō)卻不敢說(shuō)的話,我希望真的反應(yīng)出很多人的心聲。
在我博士生的研究生涯中,我希望能研究網(wǎng)路上的知識(shí)分享和收集行為還有如何利用資訊技術(shù)和知識(shí)管理減少工程師的雜務(wù)使企業(yè)員工都能在工作中獲得成長(zhǎng),而不光是消耗他們的才能最後我還是要感謝每個(gè)人,希望各位未來(lái)在日月光都能有好的薪資,在工作上也能得到成長(zhǎng)。也許幾年以後我得到學(xué)位之後,我們還有一起工作的機(jī)會(huì)。